Texas Relies Too Much on Local Taxpayers to Fund Public Education

/, Economic Opportunity, Education, Invest in Texas, K-12 Public Education, Texas Legislature/Texas Relies Too Much on Local Taxpayers to Fund Public Education

Texans value public education. Our constitution and state laws decree that providing a quality education for all children is a state responsibility.[1] Texas law also states that the school finance system should be substantially financed through state revenue sources.[2] However, because the school finance system is outdated and underfunded, lawmakers have substantially shifted the responsibility to fund public education (through the Foundation School Program[3]) to local property tax payers.

How do we get the state’s contribution equal to what local property tax payers are currently contributing?

To make the state and local shares of public education funding even without reducing local contributions would require nearly $10 billion in additional state funding per year.

There are several ways to direct funding through the Foundation School Program. For this analysis we focused on increasing the basic allotment, which is the base, per student funding level every school district receives. We estimate the basic allotment would need to increase to $6,600 per student from the current amount of $5,140 to reach an even state-local split for 2018. As a result, the average funding per weighted student[4] would increase to $7,650 from $5,845.

An investment of this size would also decrease the amount of recapture property-wealthy districts send to the state by 44 percent. However, to keep the state and local share equal, under this scenario the legislature would need to increase the basic allotment each year to keep pace with rising property values. Under our estimates the state share would slip to 48 percent in 2019 if the basic allotment stayed at $6,600 per student.

Why have the state and local shares become so uneven?

The level of funding an individual school district receives is based on a complex set of formulas that adjust for district and student characteristics. Once the funding level is determined, school districts collect local property tax dollars to fund the school. If the district is not able to collect enough funds locally, then the state fills in the rest. If the district is able to collect more than the established funding level, then the excess tax collections are sent to the state to be redistributed to other districts and charter schools – this is known as recapture or “Robin Hood.”

Texas is a growing state, and as a result, property values are growing nearly everywhere. When a district collects more property tax revenue locally, the state is able to contribute less to meet that district’s funding level. The formulas that make up the school finance system are not adjusted for inflation or growth in property values. Many formula elements are thirty years old or are based on outdated data. For example, the Cost of Education Index, intended to adjust for size of the district, teacher salaries in neighboring districts, and the percentage of low-income students is based on data from the 1989-1990 school year.

The state’s over-reliance on local property tax revenue prevents school districts from lowering tax rates, is leading to growing recapture payments, and allows the state to direct dollars otherwise intended for education to other expenses.


[1] The Texas Constitution. Article 7. Section 1. and Texas Education Code. Chapter 4. Section 001.

[2] Texas Education Code. Chapter 42. Section 001.

[3] The Foundation School Program refers to the set of formulas and laws that provide and maintain operation for public education. The Foundation School Program does not include federal funding or grants and special programs funded outside the school finance system formulas.

[4] The Foundation School Program provides weighted funding for special populations such as English language learners, special education, and gifted & talented. The weights are averaged out to create an apples-to-apples comparison between districts with varying types of students.

Chandra Villanueva oversees the Center's work on education, workforce development and job quality. She joined CPPP in 2010 and focused on school finance and education policy ranging from early education to higher education access and success. Prior to joining the Center, Chandra was the manager of Advocacy and Public Policy with the Women’s Prison Association (WPA) in New York City. At WPA, she educated formerly incarcerated women on the legislative process and researched options for pregnant women in the criminal justice system. Chandra has also served as a Bill Emerson National Hunger Fellow with the Congressional Hunger Center with placements in Tucson, Arizona and Washington, DC. Chandra earned a Master of Public Administration from New York University's Robert F. Wagner Graduate School of Public Service, and a Bachelor of Arts from The Evergreen State College in Olympia, Washington.

No comments yet.

Leave a comment

Your email address will not be published.